That was outgoing Rockland County Executive Scott Vanderhoef’s
1993 campaign slogan; the energetic pledge of a school board president who vowed
to apply non-political, business savvy to a county government weary from the
nasty Democratic primary that forced his incumbent opponent,
John T. Grant, from office.
As Vanderhoef prepares to deliver his 20th and final “State
of the County” message tonight, it’s fair to say the bloom is off the
rose. The county’s bond rating is the
worst in the state. Its government is
approaching dysfunction-- unable to award bus contracts, maintain its animal
shelter or even agree on a process to dispose of its deficit plagued hospital.
The battled to succeed the moderate Republican, who
announced last fall he would not seek re-election, is a race away from his
legacy. None of candidates, in either
party, speak well of the incumbent. Two
of the candidates, Republican Ed Day and Democrat Ilan Schoenberger, will be
among the Legislators in the audience listening to tonight’s address. Probably more eyes will be on them than on
Vanderhoef.
But despite the county’s notorious fiscal travails, which
began long before Vanderhoef’s present term, Rockland voters have kept
Vanderhoef at the helm through many political seasons. In his re-election efforts, he vanquished
well regarded state and county legislators and a town supervisor. When he sought a third term in 2001, he had
no major party opposition.
Wild vagaries in the Republican political brand also never
impacted his local reign. Democrats who
vigorously opposed Vanderhoef campaigns for Congress, State Senate and Lieutenant
Governor supported his re-elections.
20 years ago, Vanderhoef energetically promised to run a
bi-partisan administration—wise political rhetoric given the huge debate over
Democratic Party patronage in that campaign.
But it is a promise he kept.
Vanderhoef’s administration regularly hired Democrats—in his
personal office, as his County Attorney and even as his Commissioner of
Finance. Sure, it kept political
opponents at bay by employing Democratic insiders, but it also affirmed
Vanderhoef’s commitment to avoiding a highly partisan culture in county
government. Republican insiders
regularly carped about Democratic hirings, but voters liked the two party
approach. Vanderhoef retained a bipartisan
sheen even when the county’s lousy fiscal news dulled his ambitions.
That legacy will likely spill over into the administration
of his successor, whomever that may be. Meeting
the county’s immense fiscal challenges will require bipartisan consensus. Huge departures in county employees over the
past few years, and budgetary pressure limiting salaries, will require the next
County Executive to search widely, in all parties, for qualified commissioners
to help nurse the county back to fiscal health.
I first met Vanderhoef at his first State of the County
message in 1994. In a chat outside the Legislative Chambers after his
speech, he asked me if I was interested in serving on one of the county’s boards
and to send in a resume. I responded
that he must not know I was a Democrat.
“I know exactly who you are and what your party is,” he
responded. “I’m not running a partisan
government.”
And he hasn’t.
Excellent capsule of Vanderhoff's tenure.
ReplyDelete